![]() |
| Rehumanize Conference speakers Jazzi Milton, Herb Geraghty, Kristen Day, and Tom Shakely |
Monday, August 31, 2020
Rehumanize Conference Recap
Friday, August 28, 2020
Pro-Life Happenings THIS WEEKEND
It's a very busy time for Secular Pro-Life!
Saturday, August 29 (TOMORROW) from 10:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Eastern: Join us for the virtual Rehumanize Conference! This can't-miss event brings together activists on a range of issues — including abortion, racism, the death penalty, and much more — to learn from one another and promote the value of every human being. It's not too late to register! More info here and here.
Sunday, August 30 at 9:00 p.m. Eastern: Tune into the Modern-Day Debate channel on YouTube for — what else? — an abortion debate! The pro-life side will be represented by Secular Pro-Life president Kelsey Hazzard and pro-life libertarian Kay Fellows. The pro-choice side will be represented by YouTubers Hannah Reloaded and NineTail CosmicFox.
In case you missed it, part 1: Last Saturday, Rehumanize International and Americans United for Life released a vital agenda for restorative justice after Roe v. Wade is reversed. Secular Pro-Life is pleased to endorse this plan because we know that our work will not end with Roe's reversal; defiant illegal abortionists will need to held accountable, and we will need to bring healing to individuals, families, and communities impacted by abortion. These concrete restorative justice proposals will guide our way. Read more here, or watch the presentation here.
In case you missed it, part 2: 'Tis the week of strategic planning! On Wednesday, Students for Life Action released their Blueprint for a Post-Roe America, a youth-led plan to build and sustain a pro-life society, which Secular Pro-Life has also endorsed. The six key points are (1) reverse Roe and Doe; (2) curtail the expansion of the abortion industry; (3) promote adoption and foster care reform; (4) support pregnant and parenting students; (5) encourage family-friendly workplaces; and (6) defund the abortion industry. Add your name to the blueprint and check out the launch video, featuring Kelsey Hazzard alongside Kristan Hawkins, Christina Bennett, Charlotte Pence Bond, and Joshua Edmonds!
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Book Review: "Belabored: A Vindication of the Rights of Pregnant Women"
One of Lenz's most compelling points is that our cultural mythology of motherhood focuses almost exclusively on married, middle-class, able-bodied white women who can afford to stay home and care for their children 24/7. America does not consider Black, LGBTQ, disabled, or fat women to be ideal mothers. Nearly half of pregnant women in the U.S. are considered obese, and study after study shows that doctors routinely fail to see the woman for the weight, making generalizations based on biased and obsolete data. Fat mothers' food choices and those of their children are judged and scrutinized, and if they are not strictly regulating their bodies, society treats them with condescension and scorn. All pregnant people deal with this to some extent, with random strangers touching their stomachs without consent and offering unsolicited advice, but the judgment is much harsher for fat women.
Black women are also excluded from the mythology of American motherhood. The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world, with an estimated 700-900 deaths annually, a staggering sixty percent of which are preventable. The maternal mortality rate for Black women is three times higher than that of white women. Due to unconscious bias in the medical system, pregnant Black women are often undertreated for pain, and when they report symptoms, they are less likely to be believed. Lenz also calls out the virulent homophobia that pregnant LGBTQ people face when seeking care: being misgendered, being forced to fill out forms assuming a heteronormative family structure, having the nonbirthing partner being barred from the delivery room even in situations where a heterosexual male partner would be permitted. Lenz discusses how the patriarchal medical establishment discredited midwives and over-medicalized the female body, taking childbirth out of supportive feminine communities and relegating it strictly to hospital settings controlled by men. A quarter of women report experiencing some form of trauma or PTSD after childbirth, feeling that their autonomy and wishes were not respected. Despite these powerful discussions, the book takes a strong pro-choice stance and is inconsistent in discussions of preborn life.
Lenz refers to her first pregnancy as "the first time I created life." But later in the book, she refers to zygotes as potential life. Lenz writes exquisitely about the feelings of grief, shame, and emptiness that accompany miscarriage, stating that for the intangible worth we ascribe to every human being, including the viable fetus, no tangible substitute exists. But the worth is ascribed, not inherent. The worth exists only so long as the unborn child is wanted and planned.
Lenz defaults to the common pro-choice argument that the truth of when a human life becomes a person is and always will be unknown, because it's a question of philosophy, not science. She dismisses pro-lifers' claim to speak for the unborn as "creating a divide where none exists" between mother and child. Apparently, by asserting the individuality of preborn children, pro-lifers turn pregnancy into an adversarial relationship. She seems to want to have her cake and eat it too: to see the pregnant person and preborn child as simultaneously a united whole and two distinct entities. Lenz raises this fascinating question about the relationship between mother and child: "Even after the umbilical cord is cut, is the separation total?" She acknowledges that newborn children contain cells from both of their parents and are still completely dependent on them for care, yet she sees no cognitive dissonance in the fact that it is somehow okay to kill those children inside of the womb but not outside of it. The author clearly considers newborn children to be persons, so despite all her talk about autonomy, independence is clearly not the defining criteria of personhood. I can only assume that the author believes in the magical power of the birth canal to turn human lives with little outside moral relevance into actual people.
Despite its inconsistencies regarding preborn life, Belabored is a powerful book about pregnancy and motherhood that pro-lifers can get much out of. In addition to working to end abortion, pro-lifers can and should work toward improving birth outcomes for Black, disabled, fat, and LGBTQ people. Birth should be an empowering experience, not a traumatic one, and we can work to stamp out racist, ableist, and homophobic biases in our communities and healthcare system that rob pregnant people of their autonomy and humanity during their prenatal, delivery, and postnatal periods. We can normalize nonbinary/transgender pregnancies instead of treating them as sad aberrations. We can tell more inclusive stories about motherhood, focusing on the experiences of invisible and marginalized mothers. In this way, the pro-life movement can help our world see mothers not just as vessels for preborn children, but as nuanced, multi-faceted human beings with complex needs. Only then will we build a culture in which abortion can become unnecessary and unthinkable.
[Today's guest post is by Sophie Trist. If you would like to contribute a guest post, email your submission to info@secularprolife.org for consideration.]
Monday, August 24, 2020
Yeah, about that bizarre "Satanic abortions" story
Friday, August 21, 2020
Join us for a virtual conference next Saturday, August 29!
One of our favorite pro-life gatherings of the year, Rehumanize Conference, is fast approaching! It's virtual this year, making it accessible to people around the world. It's also very affordable, with a suggested donation between $5 and $75 as you are able.
The speaker lineup is incredible, and Breakout Session 2 gives you a choice between two atheists with deep ties to SPL: Terrisa Bukovinac sharing her on-the-street activism insights from San Francisco, and Sarah Terzo co-chairing a discussion about spreading the message of human value through the creative arts. Secular Pro-Life is a proud sponsor, and we will have a live-feed exhibit booth where you can say boo to me during breaks.
If you're on the fence and wanting a better idea of what to expect, you're in luck: tomorrow at noon Eastern time, hop onto the Rehumanize International facebook page for a live presentation by executive director Aimee Murphy and Americans United for Life CEO Catherine Glenn Foster. They'll be discussing how the restorative model of justice can address illegal abortions after Roe is overturned and the right to life restored.
Monday, August 17, 2020
Shouting About Heartbeats
![]() |
| Sonogram of a six-week-old human in the womb |
I recently stumbled upon a Facebook post by Shout Your Abortion, setting forth "language to avoid when talking about abortion" and their preferred dehumanizing euphemisms. Most of it was unsurprising (Abortion supporters hate the word "baby"? You don't say!), but this one caught my attention:
We have written before about the pro-choice movement's steadfast science denial on this issue. Shout Your Abortion is simply wrong; a human embryo does have a heartbeat at six weeks. If you find that fact stigmatizing, ask yourself why.
But there's an additional level of irony here that we should take a moment to appreciate.
Here are the relevant portions of Louisiana's heartbeat bill:
Except as provided in Paragraph (2), (3), or (4) of this Subsection, it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly perform an abortion with the specific intent of causing or abetting the termination of the life of an unborn human being when a fetal heartbeat has been detected.
"Fetal heartbeat" means cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac
No abortion is authorized or shall be performed if an unborn child has been determined in accordance with Code Section 31-9B-2 to have a detectable human heartbeat except... [exceptions follow]
'Detectable human heartbeat' means embryonic or fetal cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the heart within the gestational sac
Contrary to Shout Your Abortion's post, Alabama does not have a heartbeat bill; it went a step further and passed a total abortion ban instead. But here are two more states that do have heartbeat bills:
A physician shall not perform an abortion upon a pregnant woman when it has been determined that the unborn child has a detectable fetal heartbeat, unless, in the physician's reasonable medical judgment, a medical emergency exists, or when the abortion is medically necessary.
"Fetal heartbeat" means cardiac activity, the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac.
Except as provided in paragraph (b) or (c) of this subsection (2), no person shall knowingly perform an abortion on a pregnant woman with the specific intent of causing or abetting the termination of the life of the unborn human individual that the pregnant woman is carrying and whose fetal heartbeat has been detected.
"Fetal heartbeat" means cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac.
Notice what they all have in common? None of them identify a gestational age. Georgia notes the existence of a heartbeat by six weeks in a related informed consent measure, but not in the body of its heartbeat bill; the other states' heartbeat bills don't mention the six-week milestone at all! These abortion limits are based on the presence of a detectable heartbeat, rather than on a particular week of pregnancy.
That means that Shout Your Abortion and its cohorts must have followed this three-step process:
1. Read bills banning abortion when there is a heartbeat.
2. Determine that the laws ban abortion after six weeks, because that is when the heartbeat (steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart) begins.
3. "Don't call it a heartbeat bill! That's scientifically inaccurate! Call it a six-week ban!"
Step four: rational people's heads explode.
If abortion supporters had proof that the human heartbeat does not begin until some later point in pregnancy, it would be in their financial interest to argue that heartbeat bills don't apply until that later point. But they don't make that argument, because at some level they know the truth. They're just unwilling to contend with the harsh reality that abortion stops a beating heart.
Friday, August 14, 2020
Colorado Voters Prepare for Late-Term Abortion Referendum
![]() |
| Pro-life advocates demonstrate in front of the Colorado state capitol building Image credit: Respect Life Denver Facebook page |
"The abortion lobby, for a very long time, has tried to silo abortion by characterizing it as just a religious issue, just a theological difference of opinion. When what we're really talking about is violence, lethal violence, against a flesh-and-blood human being. And you don't have to be religious to recognize that."
So said Secular Pro-Life president Kelsey Hazzard during a recent interview on a Denver-based Catholic radio show. The interview covered the secular case for life and related topics, especially Colorado's upcoming referendum (Proposition 115) against late-term abortions. If recent events have you down about the presidential election, you certainly are not alone; don't forget about referenda and down-ballot races!
10:50 — Interview begins
11:40 — The mission and history of Secular Pro-Life
15:15 — Common ground across religious differences; dialogue tips
19:35 — Colorado's extreme laws allowing abortion even in the third trimester
21:10 — Our partnership with the Equal Rights Institute
22:02 — Pro-life and pro-woman
24:45 — Arguments against late-term abortion
26:18 — How to connect with Secular Pro-Life; Rehumanize Conference on August 29
Wednesday, August 12, 2020
MONDAY: Speak Up for Life at the Democratic National Convention
As you have no doubt heard, Joe Biden announced yesterday that Sen. Kamala Harris is the Democratic nominee for Vice President of the United States. The Democratic Party's pro-abortion policies are bad enough, but the selection of Harris — who, in her previous role as Attorney General of California, pursued a legal vendetta against pro-life journalist David Daleiden (even going so far as to order a baseless raid on his home) — leaves no doubt that Biden has abandoned pro-life voters.
We cannot reward this extremism with silence. It's more important than ever for left-leaning and moderate pro-lifers to make their voices heard!
Democrats for Life of America (DFLA) is holding a virtual pro-life caucus to coincide with the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on Monday, August 17 beginning at 1:00 p.m. Eastern time.
Are you fed up with abortion extremism in the Democratic Party? Are you left-leaning, moderate, independent, or a Republican who would consider voting Democrat if the Party wasn’t so Pro-Abortion? Are you tired of having your vote taken for granted? You’ve come to the right place!
Join our Executive Director, Kristen Day, DFLA Board Member, Terrisa Bukovinac, and the LEGENDARY Pro-Life Democrat, Louisiana State Rep. Katrina Jackson, (and many more!) for our Pro-Life Caucus hosted LIVE from outside the Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee, WI!
The event is free, but registration is required. Sign up today!
Monday, August 10, 2020
We Asked, You Answered: Systemic Factors Driving Abortion
We recently posted on the Secular Pro-Life facebook page:
An author working on a book about political engagement asked: "Conservatives I speak with often blame the federal government for a lot of social problems, while liberals tend to blame capitalism. Viewing the issue of abortion from a systemic standpoint, what are the institutional sources of this problem?"
After telling him that volumes could be written on that question and giving him an academic lead, I answered: "Blaming the federal government or capitalism is too simplistic; we've long lived with both, and yet abortion rates have varied tremendously over the years. We know that the most common reasons women give for seeking abortions are financial—and pro-life organizations do a lot to try to ease those financial burdens, which often saves lives—but that can't be the whole story either, beause children outside the womb are expensive too, and yet low-income mothers don't kill their older children a million times a year. It's complicated. Government refusal to recognize prenatal rights, corporate failure to provide adequate family leave, poverty, lack of health insurance, cultural acceptance of dehumanization (i.e. "clump of cells"), social shaming of pregnancy in teens and unmarried people, fear mongering about disabilities, foregoing or misusing contraception, predatory men abandoning their responsibilities... all these factors and many others play a role."
What additional factors can you think of? And if you could change just ONE thing to prevent abortions, what would it be?
An excellent conversation ensued. In no particular order, here are a few comments that caught our eye.
Krystal W.: I think the culture around pregnancy needs the most change. Stop telling women and men that they can't do things when they have children. Every time they say that, I think of someone I know who did those exact things. Can't go to school and be pregnant, can't get a good job, can't have a social life, can't be happy, can't retire, can't afford it (because yes kids can be pricey but guess what poor people have always had the most children and it works out), etc.
Leette E.: EDUCATION. Our continued failure to provide all children with comprehensive sex education which should include embryology and prenatal development is a huge part of the reason abortion is still an issue.
Victoria R.: More 👏🏻Paid👏🏻Parental leave👏🏻 At his first job my husband didn’t even really get any sort of family leave at all. Now he gets 16 weeks paid! Definitely looking forward to that aspect of baby #2 waaaayyyyy more
Crystal K.: I would change the way that society views women's bodies. Pregnancy is not a disease that the woman needs rescued from, nor are babies tumors that need removal. Pregnancy, in fact, is an indicator that women's bodies are doing exactly what they were designed to do. Men are NOT the ultimate standard to aspire to physically, and we shouldn't have to change our physiology to match theirs to be accepted in society.
David J.: The one and only thing would be a Constitutional amendment protecting life in the womb. The only factor that ended slavery forever was the 13th amendment. The only thing which will end abortion forever is a Constitutional amendment.
Abigail H.: Stop viewing human beings as objects. Women aren’t objects for pleasure. Babies aren’t clumps of cells in the womb. We, as individuals, are not cogs in the machine. When we truly respect the dignity inherent in human life, we may be able to move past viewing human bodies as commodities.
Katie G.: The fact that government officials vote to give Planned Parenthood more money and that Planned Parenthood pays for their political campaigns is a huge, unaddressed conflict of interest.
Chrysten C.: Birthing a child in a hospital should cost less than an abortion. Unfortunately, when one is financially struggling, that comparison between a few hundred and thousands is a practical deterrent.
Elizabeth B.: White male business leaders say that women need legal abortion to achieve economic parity. This is only true because they disproportionately control the business world and they do not want their employees to have maternity leave, time off to care for sick children, flexible work schedules, etc. And to the extent they can minimize women taking maternity leave, they can also justify the lack of paternity leave policies. These a**hats see children only as impediments to profits.
Mark K.: I know it sounds old school, but teach young men how to be responsible!
Photo credit: Maria Oswalt on Unsplash
Friday, August 7, 2020
Secular Pro-Life July Recap!

Projects
To prepare for Joe Biden's selection of his running mate in early August, we published a series of articles on the top twelve contenders and their positions on abortion. Spoiler alert: They all hold extremist positions.
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4
In response to an activist judge's decision to suspend the FDA's safety regulations on abortion drugs - including the crucial in-person dispensing requirement, which helps keep abortion pills out of the hands of abusive men - we joined a coalition of pro-life organizations calling upon the FDA to remove abortion pills from the market altogether.
We exposed multiple private abortion businesses and industry lobby groups that received taxpayer subsidies through the Paycheck Protection Program, despite the fact that the program was intended for smaller businesses that are having trouble surviving during the pandemic.
We are excited to participate in Students for Life of America's fellowship programs this year! Kelsey will mentor a pro-life college student through the Wilberforce Fellowship and Terrisa will mentor a pro-life high school student through the Stevens Fellowship.
Secular Pro-Life is proud to co-sponsor the Rehumanize Conference, which will take place on Saturday, August 29. This year it is all virtual, so consider signing up!
![]() |
We gained 140 new followers, bringing us to 11,913 total. We posted 65 tweets, which were viewed 127,700 times. 11,075 of those views went to our response to Created Equal's question "If your pro-choice friend asked you why you are pro-life, what would you say?" Another top viewed tweet was our reaction to the pro-choice slogan "Fund Abortion, Build Power".
![]() |
"All cruelty springs from weakness", as Roman Philosopher Seneca observed centuries ago.
In June we gained 204 followers, bringing us to 33,022 total. Our content was viewed over 252,950 times, including 21,518 views for our "hard to swallow pills" meme on embryology.

Blogger
Our three most-read blog posts for July, in increasing order:
- Pro-Life Messages in Fantasy and Science Fiction: Guest blogger Sophie Trist isn't saying these quotes are from pro-life authors, but it is kind of hard not to see how they directly relate to the movement.
- Don't Define me by my Disease: We've said it before, but guest blogger Deb Jones gives her personal account on how harmful the message is from pro-choice advocates when they promote abortion for fetal anomalies. Abortion and ableism go hand-in-hand.
- Amy's Journey from Pro-Choice to Pro-Life: We all love a change-of-heart story. Guest blogger Amy McDonough goes through what changed her mind and made defending pre-born lives a priority in hers.
Thank you to our supporters
Thank you to those of you who donate to help support our work. SPL is run by a scant number of dedicated volunteers, and we would not be able to devote the time and energy without the help of donors like you.
If you like what we do and you want to see more, please consider donating: Paypal
If you don't use Paypal, you can also go to our Facebook page and click the blue "Donate" button under our cover photo on the right. If you would like your donation to be used for a specific need (e.g. travel costs, conference sponsorships, social media advertising, etc.) please email us (info@secularprolife.org) with your instructions. Just a reminder, if you see a post from us you really like on Facebook, you can also donate specifically to advertise it to a wider audience.
And if you haven't already, come find us on social media!











